Science 2.0 In this group: 161 papers · 37 members Invite people to joinAsk to join this groupJoin this groupFollow this groupAsk to join this groupFollow this groupStop following Share Short URL Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Embed on other sites Mendeley Philosophy Groups AArts and LiteratureAstronomy / Astrophysics / Space ScienceBBiological SciencesBusiness AdministrationCChemistryComputer and Information ScienceDDesignEEarth SciencesEconomicsEducationElectrical and Electronic EngineeringEngineeringEnvironmental SciencesHHumanitiesLLawLinguisticsMManagement Science / Operations ResearchMaterials ScienceMathematicsMedicinePPhilosophyPhysicsPsychologySSocial SciencesSports and Recreation OverviewPapers161Members50 A-Z Recently added Papers in this group 1 - 20 of 161 Prev 1 2 3 … 9 Next Rise in Scientific Journal Retractions Prompts Calls for Reform - NYTimes.com Persistent myths about open access scientific publishing | Dr Mike Taylor | Science | guardian.co.uk Academic journals: an open and shut case | Editorial | Comment is free | The Guardian Brian Cox is wrong: blogging your research is not a recipe for disaster | Sarah Kendrew | Science | guardian.co.uk locked in the ivory tower: why jstor imprisons academic research - laura mckenna - business - the atlantic Four pillars of Science 2.0: How to enable web 2.0 for scientists and overcome the legacy gap. | Research Blog Authors versus publishers « Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week Academic publishers run a guarded knowledge economy | Ben Goldacre | Comment is free | The Guardian testify: the open-science movement catches fire Cracking Open the Scientific Process ‘Open Science’ Challenges Journal Tradition With Web Collaboration - NYTimes.com Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science | David Colquhoun | Science | guardian.co.uk Open science, Freedom of Information and the Big Journal monopoly | by Martin Robbins @mjrobbins | Science | guardian.co.uk Academic publishing: Of goats and headaches | The Economist Branding academic publishers 'enemies of science' is offensive and wrong | Science | guardian.co.uk Academic publishers have become the enemies of science | Dr Mike Taylor | Science | guardian.co.uk Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist | George Monbiot | Comment is free | The Guardian Open Access à la Pirate Bay in Science Guide (2011) The Decline Effect Is Stupid The Last Psychiatrist (2011) And the Winner is Mckinsey (2009) Prev 1 2 3 … 9 Next Top tags in this group futurescienceiafp8greattoreadcrossoverreputationcrossroadpowerlawideastormgoodanticipediascience 2.0diabetesprizescrowdsourcedscienceopen science
Brian Cox is wrong: blogging your research is not a recipe for disaster | Sarah Kendrew | Science | guardian.co.uk
locked in the ivory tower: why jstor imprisons academic research - laura mckenna - business - the atlantic
Four pillars of Science 2.0: How to enable web 2.0 for scientists and overcome the legacy gap. | Research Blog
Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science | David Colquhoun | Science | guardian.co.uk
Open science, Freedom of Information and the Big Journal monopoly | by Martin Robbins @mjrobbins | Science | guardian.co.uk
Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist | George Monbiot | Comment is free | The Guardian
