Why most published research findings are false.
by
John P A Ioannidis
Related research
-
John P A Ioannidis in PLoS Medicine (2007)There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of…Save PDF to library · Related research 4,021 readers
-
John P A Ioannidis in PLoS Medicine (2007)There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of…Save reference to library · Related research 438 readers
-
Steven Goodman, Sander Greenland in PLoS Medicine (2007)Copyright: copyright 2007 Goodman and Greenland. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the…Save PDF to library · Related research 198 readers -
John P A Ioannidis in PLoS Medicine (2007)There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of…Save reference to library · Related research 1 reader
-
Steven Goodman, Sander Greenland in PLoS Medicine (2007)A recent article in this journal (Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2: e124) argued that more than half of published research findings in the medical literature are false. In this commentary, we examine the…Save PDF to library · Related research 66 readers
-
Ramal Moonesinghe, Muin J Khoury, A Cecile J W Janssens in PLoS Medicine (2007)While the authors agree with John Ioannidis that "most research findings are false," here they show that replication of research findings enhances the positive predictive value of research findings being true.Save PDF to library · Related research 101 readers
-
François Gonon, Jan-Pieter Konsman, David Cohen, Thomas Boraud in PLoS ONE (2012)Positive biomedical observations are more often published than those reporting no effect, initial observations are often refuted or attenuated by subsequent determine whether newspapers preferentially report on initial findings and whether they also…Save reference to library · Related research 4 readers
-
François Gonon, Jan-Pieter Konsman, David Cohen, Thomas Boraud in PLoS ONE (2012)Positive biomedical observations are more often published than those reporting no effect, initial observations are often refuted or attenuated by subsequent determine whether newspapers preferentially report on initial findings and whether they also…Save reference to library · Related research 47 readers
-
Rick Maurer in Journal for Quality Participation (2011)The article presents a discussion on the four major mistakes leaders make in managing change in the organization, adapted from the book "Beyond the Wall of Resistance: Why 70% of All Changes Still Fail-and What You Can Do About It."Save reference to library · Related research 1 reader
-
Martin Daumer, Ulrike Held, Katja Ickstadt, Moritz Heinz, Siegfried Schach, George Ebers in BMC Medical Research Methodology (2008)Background: Published false positive research findings are a major problem in the process of scientific discovery. There is a high rate of lack of replication of results in clinical research in general, multiple sclerosis research being no…Save PDF to library · Related research 9 readers
Readership Statistics
Readership statistics are being calculated.
Sign up today - FREE
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more
- All your research in one place
- Add and import papers easily
- Access it anywhere, anytime
