Understanding the role of open peer review and dynamic academic articles
by
Pandelis Perakakis,
Michael Taylor,
Marco G Mazza,
Varvara Trachana
Related research
-
Nature in Nature (2006)Despite enthusiasm for the concept, open peer review was not widely popular, either among authors or by scientists invited to comment.Save reference to library · Related research 11 readers
-
E Walsh, M Rooney, L Appleby, G Wilkinson in The British Journal of Psychiatry (2000)BACKGROUND: Most scientific journals practise anonymous peer review. There is no evidence, however, that this is any better than an open system. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility of an open peer review system. METHOD: Reviewers for the British…Save reference to library · Related research 5 readers
-
Christopher Lee in Frontiers in computational neuroscience (2012)A selected-papers (SP) network is a network in which researchers who read, write, and review articles subscribe to each other based on common interests. Instead of reviewing a manuscript in secret for the Editor of a journal, each reviewer simply…Save PDF to library · Related research 15 readers
-
G Eysenbach in Journal of Medical Internet Research (2004)Peer-review and publication of research protocols offer several advantages to all parties involved. Among these are the following opportunities for authors: external expert opinion on the methods, demonstration to funding agencies of prior expert…Save reference to library · Related research 6 readers
-
Gunther Eysenbach in Journal of Medical Internet Research (2004)Peer-review and publication of research protocols offer several advantages to all parties involved. Among these are the following opportunities for authors: external expert opinion on the methods, demonstration to funding agencies of prior expert…Save reference to library · Related research 7 readers
-
Susan Van Rooyen, Fiona Godlee, Stephen Evans, Nick Black, Richard Smith in BMJ British Medical Journal (1999)To examine the effect on peer review of asking reviewers to have their identity revealed to the authors of the paper.Save reference to library · Related research 9 readers
-
Axel Boldt in Journal of Scholarly Publishing (2010)Today's peer review process for scientific articles is unnecessarily opaque and offers few incentives to referees. Likewise, the publishing process is unnecessarily inefficient and its results are only rarely made freely available to the public.…Save reference to library · Related research 13 readers
-
Peter C Rigby, Margaret-Anne Storey in 2011 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE (2011)Software peer review has proven to be a successful technique in open source software (OSS) development. In contrast to industry, where reviews are typically assigned to specific individuals, changes are broadcast to hundreds of potentially…Save reference to library · Related research 36 readers
-
Irina Marinov in Nature (2006)Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journalThomas Koop and Ulrich PöschlSave reference to library · Related research 7 readers
-
Jasni Ahmad, Norshuhada Shiratuddin in Kmice 2008 Knowledge Management International Conference 2008 Transferring Managing and Maintaining Knowledge for Nation Capacity Development (2008)It has been suggested that traditional anonymous peer review lacks accountability, can lead to abuse by reviewers, and may be biased and inconsistent. In response to these criticisms, the new trend known as open-peer review process (OPR) is…Save reference to library · Related research 2 readers
Readership Statistics
Readership statistics are being calculated.
Sign up today - FREE
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more
- All your research in one place
- Add and import papers easily
- Access it anywhere, anytime