Abstraction and set theory

20Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The neo-Fregean program in the philosophy of mathematics seeks a foundation for a substantial part of mathematics in abstraction principles—for example, Hume’s Principle: The number of Fs = the number of Gs iff the Fs and Gs correspond one-one—which can be regarded as implicitly definitional of fundamental mathematical concepts—for example, cardinal number. This paper considers what kind of abstraction principle might serve as the basis for a neoFregean set theory. Following a brief review of the main difficulties confronting the most widely discussed proposal to date—replacing Frege’s inconsistent Basic Law V by Boolos’s New V which restricts concepts whose extensions obey the principle of extensionality to those which are small in the sense of being smaller than the universe—the paper canvasses an alternative way of implementing the limitation of size idea and explores the kind of restrictions which would be required for it to avoid collapse. © 2001 by the University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hale, B. (2000). Abstraction and set theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 41(4), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1038336882

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free