Abstracts from the 4th International PPRI Conference 2019: Medicines access challenge – The value of pricing and reimbursement policies

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) plays an important role in reimbursement decision-making in many countries, but recommendations vary widely throughout jurisdictions, even for the same drug. This variation may be due to differences in weighing of evidence or due to differences in values, processes or procedures; together called HTA practices. Objectives: To provide insight into the effects of differences in practices on interpretation of inter-country differences in HTA recommendations for conditionally approved drugs. Methodology: We included HTA recommendations for conditionally approved drugs (N=27) up until June 2017 from England/Wales, France, Germany, Netherlands and Scotland. Recommendations and practice characteristics were extracted from these five jurisdictions and this data was validated. The effect of non-submissions, resubmissions and reassessments, cost-effectiveness assessments and price negotiations on changes in the percentage of negative recommendations and interpretation of inter-country differences in HTA outcomes were analyzed with Fisher exact tests. Region covered: EURO, international level Time period: 2006-2017 Results: The inclusion of cost-effectiveness assessments led to significant increases in proportion of negative recommendations within England/Wales (from 4% to 50%, p<0.01) and Scotland (from 21% to 71%, p<0.01). The subsequent inclusion of price negotiations led to significant reductions in the proportion of negative recommendations in England/Wales (from 50% to 14%, p<0.01), France (from 31% to 3%, p=0.012), and Germany (from 34% to 0%, p<0.01). Results indicated that the inclusion of non- and resubmissions might impact Scottish negative HTA recommendations (from 7% to 21%), but this effect was not significant. No significant effects were observed in The Netherlands, possibly due to sample size. Conclusions and lessons learned: Variations in HTA practices between international jurisdictions can have a substantial and significant impact on conclusions about recommendations by HTA bodies, as exemplified in this cohort of conditionally approved products. Studies comparing international HTA recommendations should carefully consider possible practice variations between jurisdictions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abstracts from the 4th International PPRI Conference 2019: Medicines access challenge – The value of pricing and reimbursement policies. (2019). Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 12(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0194-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free