Activité du conseil médical en environnement intérieur (CMEI) en Bourgogne: évaluation auprès des médecins et des patients

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since December 2009, chest physicians and allergologists in Burgundy have been able to call upon a medical indoor environment counsellor (MIEC). The consultations are free for the patient and are undertaken following a medical referal after systematic cutaneous prick tests. Aims. - To describe the indications, the distribution of prescriptions and to measure the impactof the counsellor's visits on the first 100 patients at 6 months and on the physicians at 18 months.Method. - Telephone interviews with the 67 physicians (whether prescribers or not) concerningtheir motivation and/or expectations, and with the first 100 patients concerning follow up ofthe recommendations.Results. - Seventy percent of the physicians replied (n = 47). The satisfaction of prescribers(n = 22) was 8.42/10. The indications were rhinitis and a poorly controlled asthma. The requestsconcerned the search for dust mite (50 %) and moulds (46 %). Eighty-four percent of the phy-sicians discussed the MIEC's report with the patients. The patients' symptoms were rhinitis(79 %), asthma (57 %) and conjunctivitis (33 %). The Acarex test®, performed in cases of positiveprick tests to house dust mites (n = 72), was strongly positive for 67 patients. Sixteen mouldsamples out of 21 were above the standard concentrations. Sixty-nine patients had followedthe recommendations of the MIEC.Conclusion. - The impact of the MIEC visits was perceived as positive by the physicians and thepatients. The medico-economic impact warrants further evaluation. © 2013 SPLF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vagner, A., Reboux, G., Nicoullaud, V., Blanchon, L., Scherer, P., Collet, E., … Bonniaud, P. (2013). Activité du conseil médical en environnement intérieur (CMEI) en Bourgogne: évaluation auprès des médecins et des patients. Revue Des Maladies Respiratoires, 30(9), 764–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001563.pub3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free