To adapt or to defend? Comparing position shifts among Bundestag candidates between 2013 and 2017

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this research note, candidate survey data from the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) is used to analyse positional shifts of German Bundestag parties between 2013 and 2017. Two developments make Germany a particularly interesting case: (1) the liberal but also controversial policies of the Merkel cabinet during the European refugee crisis and (2) the change of leadership within the right-wing populist party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). Applying scaling techniques to locate candidates of both elections in the same two-dimensional policy space, the analysis demonstrates that in 2017 the AfD took a distinct radical right position in the party system of Germany. Moreover, the study finds that almost all parties moved to the right on the cultural left–right dimension in 2017, whereas for the economic left–right dimension this has not been the case. Contrary to the mantra of an ideological delineation against right-wing populism, there has been a robust socio-political conservative shift in the German party system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jankowski, M., Schneider, S. H., & Tepe, M. (2019). To adapt or to defend? Comparing position shifts among Bundestag candidates between 2013 and 2017. West European Politics, 42(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1576106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free