ADIPOQ gene polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The results of studies investigating the association between ADIPOQ gene polymorphisms and risk of cancer have been inconsistent and often contradictory. The present meta-analysis was conducted in order to overcome the limitations of any individual study and to provide a more precise overall effect estimate. Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase for articles published through May 2012. The strength of the relationship between the ADIPOQ gene and risk of cancer was assessed using odds ratios (ORs). Either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model was used to calculate the overall risk estimates. Fifteen studies were included and five SNPs were considered. A significant association was found between SNP rs2241766 and risk of cancer in the recessive genetic model (OR: 0.768, 95% CI: [0.626,. 0.942], P= 0.011); a significant relationship was also found between SNP rs1501299 and risk of cancer in both an allele contrast (OR: 0.141, 95%CI: [0.113,. 0.176], P< 0.001) and the dominant genetic model (OR: 0.904, 95%CI: [0.830,. 0.985], P= 0.021); no association was found with the rs266729, rs822395, or rs822396 SNPs. Adjusted ORs were also considered, but no statistically significant association was found in homozygote contrasts for any of the five SNPs after adjustment. Our results suggest that two polymorphisms, SNP rs2241766 and SNP rs1501299, of the ADIPOQ gene may be associated with reduced risk of cancer. However, the overall strength of association is mild to moderate, and additional well-designed studies are needed to confirm the present conclusion. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Y., Zhang, F., Ding, R., Skrip, L., Wang, Y., Lei, H., & Hu, D. (2013). ADIPOQ gene polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Cytokine, 61(2), 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2012.10.030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free