After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?

183Citations
Citations of this article
378Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call 'after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giubilini, A., & Minerva, F. (2013). After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(5), 261–263. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free