Alfred Schutz’s Fragments on Social Roles as a Phenomenological Alternate to Mainstream Sociology

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

My aim is to collect and consider as a whole Schutz’s fragments on the sociology of roles. With this goal, I will classify the fragments into two sets according to their theoretical intention. First, I will consider Schutz’s discussion of Parsons’ theory of social action of the 1940s. I will show that Schutz focuses on criticizing Parsons’ objectivism and on retrieving the concrete ego as the performer of social roles. Second, I will account for Schutz’s intent to elaborate on a terminology of his own concerning these issues in the 1950s. I will argue that Schutz bases his theory of social roles in his phenomenology of the life-world. This not only requires a subjective approach—which he had already provided in the 1940s—but also requires taking into account objective meaning. Other elements of Schutzian phenomenology must be called in as well, such as the relative natural conception of the world of groups, socioculturally derived knowledge, and imposed relevances. I will end by discussing the main contributions of Schutz’s conception of social roles and to what extent he succeeded in overcoming the objectivism of structural-functional theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belvedere, C. (2019). Alfred Schutz’s Fragments on Social Roles as a Phenomenological Alternate to Mainstream Sociology. Human Studies, 42(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09499-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free