Analysis of the apparent nuclear modification in peripheral Pb–Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV

24Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Charged-particle spectra at midrapidity are measured in Pb–Pb collisions at the centre-of-mass energy per nucleon–nucleon pair s NN =5.02 TeV and presented in centrality classes ranging from most central (0–5%) to most peripheral (95–100%) collisions. Possible medium effects are quantified using the nuclear modification factor (R AA ) by comparing the measured spectra with those from proton–proton collisions, scaled by the number of independent nucleon–nucleon collisions obtained from a Glauber model. At large transverse momenta (8 <20GeV/c), the average R AA is found to increase from about 0.15 in 0–5% central to a maximum value of about 0.8 in 75–85% peripheral collisions, beyond which it falls off strongly to below 0.2 for the most peripheral collisions. Furthermore, R AA initially exhibits a positive slope as a function of p T in the 8–20 GeV/c interval, while for collisions beyond the 80% class the slope is negative. To reduce uncertainties related to event selection and normalization, we also provide the ratio of R AA in adjacent centrality intervals. Our results in peripheral collisions are consistent with a PYTHIA-based model without nuclear modification, demonstrating that biases caused by the event selection and collision geometry can lead to the apparent suppression in peripheral collisions. This explains the unintuitive observation that R AA is below unity in peripheral Pb–Pb, but equal to unity in minimum-bias p–Pb collisions despite similar charged-particle multiplicities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acharya, S., Acosta, F. T., Adamová, D., Adolfsson, J., Aggarwal, M. M., Aglieri Rinella, G., … Zou, S. (2019). Analysis of the apparent nuclear modification in peripheral Pb–Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV. Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, 793, 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.04.047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free