Sign up & Download
Sign in

Analytical modelling of pesticide transport from the soil surface to a drinking water well

by W H J Beltman, J J T I Boesten, S E A T M Van Der Zee
Journal of Hydrology (1995)

Abstract

Pesticide transport through the unsaturated zone was modelled with an analytical solution of the convection-dispersion equation assuming steady water flow, a linear sorption isotherm and first-order transformation kinetics. Pesticide behaviour in the saturated zone was described with an analytical solution of the mass balance equation for a cylindrical flow system assuming steady flow, no dispersion, linear sorption and first-order transformation. This simplified model for the unsaturated-saturated soil system was developed to identify the processes and parameters with the greatest impact on the fraction of applied pesticide reaching a drinking water well. Leaching from the unsaturated zone was highly sensitive to the parameters describing travel time and transformation rate. Leaching increased when heterogeneity of the soil was taken into account. Pesticide arrival in the well was only moderately sensitive to the characteristic travel time and transformation rate in the aquifer. However, this sensitivity increases if zones without pesticide application were introduced around the wells (protection zones). For representative sandy soils under average Dutch rainfall conditions, processes in the unsaturated zone had a much larger impact on pesticide arrival in the wells than processes in the saturated zone. Protection zones reduced pesticide transport to wells substantially if their half-life was much smaller than the characteristic travel time of the pesticide in the aquifer.

Cite this document (BETA)

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

6 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
by Academic Status
 
50% Ph.D. Student
 
17% Researcher (at an Academic Institution)
 
17% Researcher (at a non-Academic Institution)
by Country
 
33% Netherlands
 
17% Switzerland
 
17% United Kingdom