Appropriateness-evaluation of interpersonal actions, and social norm: A formulation of Socio-Logics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose a hypothesis about how people evaluate the appropriateness of interpersonal actions. We first considered that people evaluate the appropriateness of actions by deduction, based on the Pareto principle. Then, we developed strategies of conflict resolution as Pareto solutions based on interdependence theory (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978). Next, we applied Luhmann's (1984) communication media theory for elaborating on the meanings of these strategies in social situations. Results showed that conflict resolution strategies could be divided into four categories: altruistic, reciprocal, role, and receptive. In addition, it was indicated that the choice of strategy depends on the relational qualities of the other. Finally, we formulated "Socio-Logic," a system of logic for appropriateness of interpersonal actions, and discussed the application of Socio-Logic to theories of social competence and social capital.View full abstract