Asking the right questions in the right way: The need for a shift in research on psychological treatments for addiction

144Citations
Citations of this article
173Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: To identify possible reasons for the disappointingly negative results of methodologically rigorous controlled trials of psychological treatments in the addictions field. Method: A selective overview of the literature on addictive behaviour change. Findings: Eight failings of existing research are described: failing to account for the outcome equivalence paradox; neglecting relationships in favour of techniques; failing to integrate treatment research and research on unaided change; imposing an inappropriate time-scale on the change process; failing to take a systems or social network view; ignoring therapists' tacit theories; not including the patient's view; and displaying an ignorance of modern developments in the philosophy of science. Conclusion: Treatment research has been asking the wrong questions in the wrong way. Three necessary shifts in ways of conducting research are proposed: (i) the field should stop studying named techniques and focus instead on change processes; (ii) change processes should be studied within the broader, longer-acting systems of which treatment is part; and (iii) science in the field should be brought up to date by acknowledging a variety of sources of useful knowledge. © 2008 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Orford, J. (2008, June). Asking the right questions in the right way: The need for a shift in research on psychological treatments for addiction. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02092.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free