Automatic ankle pressure measurements using PPG in ankle-brachial pressure index determination

26Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a new technique using a photoplethysmographic (PPG) probe for automatic ankle pressure measurements. Design: Comparative study on two techniques for ankle pressure measurement. Setting University hospital. Material: Thirty-five patients with leg arterial disease and eight healthy volunteers. Ankle-brachial indices (ABPI) were measured using conventional CW Doppler technique and PPG-based prototype equipment for the ankle pressure recordings. Chief outcome measures: ABPIs calculated from CW Doppler and PPG ankle pressure measurements. The PPG signals were analysed both by visual judgement and by a software based, automatic algorithm. Main results: The mean difference between ABPIs calculated from CW Doppler recordings and PPG (visual analysis) was -0.01 (limits of agreement (±two standard deviations) +0.16 to -0.19). The correlation coefficient was 0.93. When the algorithm was used, the mean difference (CW Doppler-PPG) was 0.05 (limits of agreement 0.28 to -0.18, r=0.89). Conclusions: The PPG method is a promising technique with an inherent potential for automatisation of the ankle pressure measurements, thereby reducing the observer-dependency in ABPI recordings. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jönsson, B., Laurent, C., Eneling, M., Skau, T., & Lindberg, L. G. (2005). Automatic ankle pressure measurements using PPG in ankle-brachial pressure index determination. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 30(4), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free