Beyond dichotomy-towards creative synthesis

7Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There are two ways for overcoming limitations of methods used in psychology, as Toomela (Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007- 9004-0 , 2007) points out. These are inventing new methods of research, and looking back into the history of methodological thought for new ideas. Though he limited the former as if it is a quantitative area and he declared to take the latter path, his paper actually advocates the need to create new methodology for understanding the human psyche through historical approach. We discuss problems of sampling and generalization in that context, and suggest a new way to creative synthesis through elaboration of qualitative methodologies. To us this direction constitutes an updated version of the German-Austrian methodology exactly as Toomela suggests. © 2007 Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sato, T., Watanabe, Y., & Omi, Y. (2007). Beyond dichotomy-towards creative synthesis. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9009-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free