The case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, evidence, and does professional self-regulation work?

11Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dr. Mehmet Oz is widely known not just as a successful media personality donning the title “America's Doctor ® ,” but, we suggest, also as a physician visibly out of step with his profession. A recent, unsuccessful attempt to censure Dr. Oz raises the issue of whether the medical profession can effectively self-regulate at all. It also raises concern that the medical profession's self-regulation might be selectively activated, perhaps only when the subject of professional censure has achieved a level of public visibility. We argue here that the medical profession must look at itself with a healthy dose of self-doubt about whether it has sufficient knowledge of or handle on the less visible Dr. “Ozes” quietly operating under the profession's presumptive endorsement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tilburt, J. C., Allyse, M., & Hafferty, F. W. (2017). The case of Dr. Oz: Ethics, evidence, and does professional self-regulation work? AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.msoc1-1702

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free