Clients, Contracts, and Profits: Conflicts in Public Archaeology

  • Raab L
  • Schiffer M
  • Klinger T
  • et al.
16Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The client‐oriented approach to contract archaeology is a technical service rather than genuine scientific research. Such an approach fails to meet the requirements of the law, fails to satisfy the needs of archaeological science, and frequently fails to protect the client's interests. A client orientation encourages an excessive emphasis on profits from contract work. Profits not only exclude a balance of archaeological, client, and public interests but threaten the scientific future of contract work. Solutions to the problem of client‐oriented work include better academic training as researchers, support for government archaeologists, a strong professional consensus on ethical and performance standards, and attention to public interests. [ contract archaeology, client‐oriented archaeology, research profits, research obligations, professionalism ]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raab, L. M., Schiffer, M. B., Klinger, T. C., & Goodyear, A. C. (1980). Clients, Contracts, and Profits: Conflicts in Public Archaeology. American Anthropologist, 82(3), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1980.82.3.02a00040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free