Sign up & Download
Sign in

Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study

by Gautam Ahuja
Administrative Science Quarterly (2000)

Abstract

To assess the effects of a firm's network of relations on innovation, this paper elaborates a theoretical framework that relates three aspects of a firm's ego network-direct ties, indirect ties, and structural holes (disconnections between a firm's partners)-to the firm's subsequent innovation output. It posits that direct and indirect ties both have a positive impact on innovation but that the impact of indirect ties is moderated by the number of a firm's direct ties. Structural holes are proposed to have both positive and negative influences on subsequent innovation. Results from a longitudinal study of firms in the international chemicals industry indicate support for the predictions on direct and indirect ties, but in the interfirm collaboration network, increasing structural holes has a negative effect on innovation. Among the implications for interorganizational network theory is that the optimal structure of interfirm networks depends on the objectives of the network members.

Cite this document (BETA)

Available from www.jstor.org
Page 1
hidden

Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study


Page 2
hidden

Page 3
hidden

Page 4
hidden

Page 5
hidden

Page 6
hidden

Page 7
hidden

Page 8
hidden

Page 9
hidden

Page 10
hidden

Page 11
hidden

Page 12
hidden

Page 13
hidden

Page 14
hidden

Page 15
hidden

Page 16
hidden

Page 17
hidden

Page 18
hidden

Page 19
hidden

Page 20
hidden

Page 21
hidden

Page 22
hidden

Page 23
hidden

Page 24
hidden

Page 25
hidden

Page 26
hidden

Page 27
hidden

Page 28
hidden

Page 29
hidden

Page 30
hidden

Page 31
hidden

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

257 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
45% Ph.D. Student
 
12% Student (Master)
 
7% Assistant Professor
by Country
 
20% United States
 
13% Germany
 
9% United Kingdom