Comment on "Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered"

7Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Hidding, L. M., Altenburg, T. M., Poppel, M. N., & Chinapaw, M. J. M. (2016, June 10). Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free