Comparative evaluation of text- and citation-based plagiarism detection approaches using GuttenPlag

40Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Various approaches for plagiarism detection exist. All are based on more or less sophisticated text analysis methods such as string matching, fingerprinting or style comparison. In this paper a new approach called Citation-based Plagiarism Detection is evaluated using a doctoral thesis, in which a volunteer crowd-sourcing project called GuttenPlag identified substantial amounts of plagiarism through careful manual inspection. This new approach is able to identify similar and plagiarized documents based on the citations used in the text. It is shown that citation-based plagiarism detection performs significantly better than text-based procedures in identifying strong paraphrasing, translation and some idea plagiarism. Detection rates can be improved by combining citation-based with text-based plagiarism detection. © 2011 ACM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gipp, B., Meuschke, N., & Beel, J. (2011). Comparative evaluation of text- and citation-based plagiarism detection approaches using GuttenPlag. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 255–258). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/1998076.1998124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free