Sign up & Download
Sign in

A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting

by Jonathan Charteris-Black, Timothy Ennis
English for Specific Purposes (2001)

Abstract

This paper compares the use of linguistic metaphor and conceptual metaphor in a corpus of English and Spanish financial reports published in newspapers during the October 1997 stock market crash. The findings indicate much similarity in conceptual and linguistic metaphors between the two languages, but some differences in the frequency of particular linguistic metaphors. For example, both languages share conceptualisations of the economy as an organism, of market movements as physical movements and of sharp downward market movements as natural disasters. These conceptualisations show in a number of similar lexical metaphors relating to, for example, physical conflict, physical and mental health, mood, extreme weather conditions and earthquakes. However, while in Spanish reporting there is a preference for metaphors based on psychological mood and personality in English reporting there is a higher frequency of nautically based metaphors. There is consideration of the implications of these findings for economists, financial experts, translators, ESP students and those interested in comparative research into metaphor and economics

Author-supplied keywords

Cite this document (BETA)

Available from linkinghub.elsevier.com
Page 1
hidden

A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting

 

      
       
       


   


    

    
  
      
     

         
     !   
   "  #$$% 
   &      
      
   
   
!   ! 
 
   '      (
   
  
 
  & ) *   
   
       
     
     
     !!  

   
     &   
   !   
      * 
       *    +         
*  !       (
 & ,!
 !          
                        
       (
  
      &        
             *      - 
  
      
        & .//#    
0
 & -
    
   1&     
&
 
 2 3 4  3 1 * 3  3  



5          !       
!     
  
 
 &  
 
 

61' 7   #$8/9         
 :  
 ! 
      
        6,    #$$;9& 2
  
 <
                !     
      
       ! !
       
 
         ! ! *   6  7 1! #$$$9&
       -
 ./ 6.//#9 .;$=.>>
!!!& 
&? ? 
/88$;$/>?/#?@./&//  .//#     0
 & -
    
   1&   
 
&
-5 5 A /88$;$/>6// 9////$ /
    
&  &A B;;#;8C.D$$#/ *& .8>;3 *A B;;#;8C.D$D/%&
  E&   F
 &&
 6&   9&
Page 2
hidden
                  *   
     !  
  
 & )    
  ! !   
     
      !   !  * 
  
 
  * !         !       
 * &   *   !  !      !   
               & G ! 
1'
  H     
             
  ! ! !  *      '     
     
    

&
I 6#$$;9 
 ! 
!         
 


          
     6.///9
         

   & G 
          
!  -  
   
 &          
     
 
       
        
 !     & G !        
 
  !
(

         
     

    
                 
!      & 5  !     
  
    
  '    
    !         
  &
 *   !       
   
    
     *   !    
 !         
 1#   1.& "      =G , 6!    
     +
  
  
9    !   
   '  

      +   '   !  
  !&   
 (
     )  6#$$/ & D.9      !  '  

        
 
  '  & 
  !


     !    '     
!  
 
!       
 !
 
  1.       
 
   
   
 &   
 
 (
 
              
 
    

    E     
      E
      

  &
   
!      
 '  
  
   !   3  !   !       '    
                  
   !
  &                
!   A
     * 6  9  !  !     6
  9  
 
    6 
 9& "      !    

    !   !             6 & &
       
  9         6

 9&     
  
  
 !    


 !      &      
     
 
    
(
        3 
 
.D/ !" # $%& '"  ( )
 %*% +

 , -,,./ 01233

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

11 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
18% Student (Bachelor)
 
18% Senior Lecturer
 
18% Ph.D. Student
by Country
 
18% United Kingdom
 
9% China
 
9% Vietnam