Comparison of 2 Transvaginal Surgical Approaches and Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Apical Vaginal Prolapse

  • Barber M
  • Brubaker L
  • Burgio K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Barber et al compare outcomes between Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and uterosacral ligament suspension (ULS) and perioperative behavioral therapy with pelvic floor muscle training (BPMT) and usual care in women undergoing surgery for vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Two years after vaginal surgery for prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, neither ULS nor SSLF was significantly superior to the other for anatomic, functional, or adverse event outcomes. Perioperative BPMT did not improve urinary symptoms at 6 months or prolapse outcomes at 2 years.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barber, M. D., Brubaker, L., Burgio, K. L., Richter, H. E., Nygaard, I., Weidner, A. C., … Meikle, S. F. (2014). Comparison of 2 Transvaginal Surgical Approaches and Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Apical Vaginal Prolapse. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 69(7), 393–395. https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000000079

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free