Confusion and dependence in uses of history

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many people argue that history makes a special difference to the subjects of biology and psychology, and that history does not make this special difference to other parts of the world. This paper will show that historical properties make no more or less of a difference to biology or psychology than to chemistry, physics, or other sciences. Although historical properties indeed make a certain kind of difference to biology and psychology, this paper will show that historical properties make the same kind of difference to geology, sociology, astronomy, and other sciences. Similarly, many people argue that nonhistorical properties make a special difference to the nonbiological and the nonpsychological world. This paper will show that nonhistorical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their causal behavior and that historical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their distributions. Although history is special, it is special in the same way to all parts of the world. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slutsky, D. (2012). Confusion and dependence in uses of history. Synthese, 184(3), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9785-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free