[Contact lithotripsy. Advantages and disadvantages]

  • Iglesias Prieto J
  • Perez-Castro Ellendt E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the different methods of contact lithotripsy by intracavitary direct contact or very close approximation of different rigid and flexible energy-transmitting devices (probes, fibers, etc.). METHODS: The systems commonly used, as well as those that have fallen into disuse or have not been developed further, are briefly described. RESULTS: Although no contact lithotripsy system is clearly superior over another, in our experience the electrokinetic system (Walz) is highly effective and simple to use. CONCLUSIONS: Contact lithotripsy permits stone disintegration and removal of fragments during the same surgical procedure. It improves the rate of completeness of stone removal and permits earlier functional recovery of the obstructed renal unit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iglesias Prieto, J. I., & Perez-Castro Ellendt, E. (2001). [Contact lithotripsy. Advantages and disadvantages]. Arch Esp Urol, 54(9), 885–893. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11789368

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free