Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods

  • Zhang L
  • Prasad M
  • Hsiao M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we emphasize the importance of efficient debugging in formal verification and present capabilities that we have developed in order to augment debugging in Intel’s Formal Verification Environment. We have given the name the counter-example wizard to the bundle of capabilities that we have developed to address the needs of the verification engineer in context of counter-example diagnosis and rectification. The novel features of the counterexample wizard are the multi-value counter-example annotation, multiple root cause detection, and constraint-based debugging mechanisms. Our experience with the verification of real-life Intel designs shows that these capabilities complement one another and can considerably help the verification engineer diagnose and fix a reported failure. We use real-life verification cases to illustrate how our system solution can significantly reduce the time spent in the loop of model checking, specification and design modification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, L., Prasad, M. R., & Hsiao, M. S. (2005). Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods. In D. Borrione & W. Paul (Eds.), Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods (Vol. 3725, pp. 81–96). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2156375.2156389

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free