Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program

26Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). Methods: Using a modified CISNET breast cancer simulation model, we estimated outcomes for women aged 40–64 years associated with three scenarios: breast cancer screening within the NBCCEDP, screening in the absence of the NBCCEDP (no program), and no screening through any program. We report screening outcomes, cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and sensitivity analyses results. Results: Compared with no program and no screening, the NBCCEDP lowers breast cancer mortality and improves QALYs, but raises health care costs. Base-case ICER for the program was $51,754/QALY versus no program and $50,223/QALY versus no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis ICER for the program was $56,615/QALY [95% CI $24,069, $134,230/QALY] versus no program and $51,096/QALY gained [95% CI $26,423, $97,315/QALY] versus no screening. Conclusions: On average, breast cancer screening in the NBCCEDP was cost-effective compared with no program or no screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rim, S. H., Allaire, B. T., Ekwueme, D. U., Miller, J. W., Subramanian, S., Hall, I. J., & Hoerger, T. J. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Causes and Control, 30(8), 819–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01178-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free