This longitudinal study investigates the impact of national and international pressures to improve corporate governance in an emerging economy from an institutional theory perspective. Recently, family business groups (FBGs), the dominant form of organizing in emerging economies, have been criticized by policy makers for their poor governance structures. A common recommendation to FBGs has been increasing the number of independent, outsider directors on their boards. Thus, change in the board compositions of the quoted subsidiaries of the six biggest FBGs is analyzed over 2002-2006. One-way-ANOVA and t-tests were used as statistical tools. Findings reveal that there has not been a statistically significant change in board compositions over the research period. FBGs were found to resist institutional pressures through 'avoidance', 'defiance' and "manipulation" strategies due to the absence of coercive pressures and multiple forms of 'institutional work' for change. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.
CITATION STYLE
Selekler-Goksen, N. N., & Öktem, Ö. Y. (2009). Countervailing institutional forces: Corporate governance in Turkish family business groups. Journal of Management and Governance, 13(3), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9083-z
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.