Sign up & Download
Sign in

Critical loads — A valuable catchment management tool?

by D J Tervet, D A Rendall, A B Stephen
Water Air Soil Pollution (1995)

Abstract

Planning advice for forest planting in acid sensitive areas suggests that, where calculated critical loads for acidity are exceeded at a catchment level, new conifer planting may not be appropriate. In south west Scotland, acid waters are currently found in areas where critical loads are not exceeded. The rivers Cree and Bladnoch show a decline in pH of about one unit since 1970, when major afforestation of the headwaters began. No equivalent decline in pH was observed in the adjacent Water of Luce, although it receives similar inputs and has similar geology and soils. Little of the Luce catchment is afforested. Recent surveys of water quality, invertebrate fauna and salmonid fish reveal a picture of widespread acid conditions, impoverished benthos and absence of young salmon. 25 streams (total catchment > 150km2) recorded pH 1.5keqha lyr" for 12 and >2keqha ~yr~for 6 of the 25 streams. Published deposition data suggested that one stream with pH <4.5 and 7 streams with pH <5 were in areas where critical load was not exceeded. In 22 catchments, forestry was a major land use. To be effective as planning and management tools, systems must be robust and easy to operate. Critical load exceedance calculations remain research tools at the catchment level where deposition data is generally inadequate. The uncertainties inherent in critical load exceedances render them sources of argument and not beacons of enlightenment.

Cite this document (BETA)

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

4 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
by Academic Status
 
25% Researcher (at an Academic Institution)
 
25% Researcher (at a non-Academic Institution)
 
25% Professor
by Country
 
25% Netherlands
 
25% Ireland
 
25% Spain