Cross-validation of inferred daytime airborne CO 2 urban-regional scale surface fluxes with eddy-covariance observations and emissions inventories in Greater London

  • Font A
  • Grimmond C
  • Morguí J
  • et al.
ISSN: 1680-7375
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract. Data obtained from eleven flight surveys on six days during October 2011 were used to characterize the urban CO 2 dome in Greater London (GL) and to calculate CO 2 fluxes at the city scale. Flights crossed GL along two transects (SW-NE and SSE-NNW) at an altitude of 360 m. Increments as high as 23 ppmv were measured. The maximum CO 2 mixing ratios were localized over GL under low wind speeds, whereas a displacement of the urban plume downwind from the centre of the urban area occurred during high wind speeds. The urban-regional surface CO 2 flux was calculated for four days by the Integrative Mass Boundary Layer (IMBL) method. The diurnal CO 2 flux in GL obtained from the aircraft observations ranged from 46 to 104 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 during the day time. The mean CO 2 fluxes estimated from the IMBL method were statistically similar to those observed by eddy-covariance systems located in central London and a spatially integrated emissions inventory for GL. This study provides an important cross-validation of two independent measurement-based methods to infer the contribution of urban areas to climate change in terms of CO 2 surface fluxes, both of which complement bottom-up emissions inventories. The uncertainties of fluxes estimated by the IMBL method are considered and the limits of implementation of atmospheric methods to infer city-scale fluxes are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Font, a., Grimmond, C. S. B., Morguí, J. -a., Kotthaus, S., Priestman, M., & Barratt, B. (2013). Cross-validation of inferred daytime airborne CO 2 urban-regional scale surface fluxes with eddy-covariance observations and emissions inventories in Greater London. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 13(5), 13465–13493. Retrieved from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/13/13465/2013/

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free