Damnum versus Quaestus

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Not only is bioethics fundamental to determining or guiding how we live and die, its role as the key interconnecting strand between various disciplines, the public, and decision makers is unique. The works featured here are from a collection entitled "Damnum versus Quaestus" (loss versus gain). They are informed by the lived experience of being with someone (described here as "the patient") as he or she lives through the process of dying.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Boyle, L. (2017). Damnum versus Quaestus. AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(7), 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.7.imhl1-1707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free