Decentralized Implementation of Flood Resilience Measures–A Blessing or a Curse? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan and the Royal Docks Regeneration

7Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article presents a case study on the implementation of the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan in the Royal Docks, a regeneration project in the East of London. On paper, the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan advances the shift from traditional flood control to flood resilience, because of its long-term horizon, estuary-wide approach, and emphasis on floodplain management. In practice, however, we identify three frictions between vision and reality: a lack of local ownership of the plan, a lack of clear guidance for floodplain management, and limited capacities with local authority. These frictions suggest an ongoing ‘public-public divide’ in decentralized governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Restemeyer, B., Van Den Brink, M., & Woltjer, J. (2019). Decentralized Implementation of Flood Resilience Measures–A Blessing or a Curse? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan and the Royal Docks Regeneration. Planning Practice and Research, 34(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2018.1546918

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free