Sign up & Download
Sign in

Defining assessment projects and scenarios for policy support: Use of ontology in Integrated Assessment and Modelling

by S Janssen, F Ewert, Hongtao Li, I N Athanasiadis, J J F Wien, O Thérond, M J R Knapen, I Bezlepkina, J Alkan-Olsson, A E Rizzoli, H Belhouchette, M Svensson, M K Van Ittersum show all authors
Environmental Modelling Software (2009)

Abstract

Abstract: Integrated Assessment and Modelling (IAM) provides an interdisciplinary approach to support ex-ante decision-making by combining quantitative models representing different systems and scales into a framework for integrated assessment. Scenarios in IAM are developed in the interaction between scientists and stakeholders to explore possible pathways of future development. As IAM typically combines models from different disciplines, there is a clear need for a consistent definition and implementation of scenarios across models, policy problems and scales. This paper presents such a unified conceptualization for scenario and assessment projects. We demonstrate the use of common ontologies in building this unified conceptualization, e.g. a common ontology on assessment projects and scenarios. The common ontology and the process of ontology engineering are used in a case study, which refers to the development of SEAMLESS-IF, an integrated modelling framework to assess agricultural and environmental policy options as to their contribution to sustainable development. The presented common ontology on assessment projects and scenarios can be reused by IAM consortia and if required, adapted by using the process of ontology engineering as proposed in this paper. Copyright &y& Elsevier Copyright of Environmental Modelling & Software is the property of Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cite this document (BETA)

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in

Readership Statistics

7 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
43% Ph.D. Student
 
29% Post Doc
 
29% Researcher (at an Academic Institution)
by Country
 
29% Germany
 
14% India
 
14% Switzerland