Dermal Exposure to Electroplating Fluids and Metalworking Fluids in the UK

20Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper describes workplace dermal exposure measurements that were carried out by the Health and Safety Laboratory as part of the EU RISKOFDERM project. Exposure to metal-working fluids (MWFs) was measured at three sites on 25 subjects who were 'mechanically treating solid objects' as they loaded and supervised milling and boring machines and lathes. Thirty-one samples were obtained, of which 18 were exposures to neat mineral oils and 13 to water-oil mixes. All subjects wore Tyvek® whole-body oversuits that were analysed in their entirety to extract the MWF. The geometric mean surface loading rate of the 31 oversuits was 62 μg/cm2/h (GSD = 4.6) and of the seven pairs of sampling gloves (worn inside protective gloves) was 2900 μg/cm 2/h (GSD = 1.67). Exposure to electroplating fluids was measured at three sites on 27 subjects who were dipping objects into tanks of either chromic acid, nickel sulphate, copper sulphate, copper cyanide or zinc hydroxide. All subjects wore Tyvek® wholebody oversuits that were surface scanned over their areas using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer to detect all the metal atoms simultaneously. Contamination was assessed using the method of Dirichlet tessellation. The geometric mean surface loading rate of the 26 oversuits was 37 μg/cm2/h (GSD = 3.5) and of the 25 pairs of sampling gloves (worn inside protective gloves) was 190 μg/cm 2/h (GSD = 2.75). Almost all of the electroplating samples were below the limit of quantification. More than one species of metal atoms was found on some of the samples afterwards, indicating cross-contamination from other baths during the sampling period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roff, M., Bagon, D. A., Chambers, H., Dilworth, E. M., & Warren, N. (2004). Dermal Exposure to Electroplating Fluids and Metalworking Fluids in the UK. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 48(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meh029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free