Use of DNA from bite marks to determine species and individual animals that attack humans

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

During the summer of 2008, 6 documented attacks and close encounters with brown bears (Ursus arctos) occurred in the greater Anchorage, Alaska (USA) area. We discuss findings from 2 incidents in which people were mauled within 2 km of each other over a 6-week period and in which it was assumed that a single animal was responsible. To ensure public safety, authorities killed a brown bear implicated in the attacks by circumstantial evidence, though it was not known a priori that the animal was responsible. We extracted DNA from hairs and bite sites on the clothing of both victims and determined species and individual identity of the animal(s) involved in both incidents. Genetic data indicated the brown bear killed by authorities was responsible for one of the maulings, but not both. This research demonstrates that DNAbased techniques, with appropriate sampling, can provide unambiguous identification of animals involved in attacks, as well as provide reasonable justification for excluding others. Because DN -based techniques can unequivocally identify individual bears carrying out attacks, they should be considered a standard method employed in wildlife attack investigations. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farley, S., Talbot, S. L., Sage, G. K., Sinnott, R., & Coltrane, J. (2014). Use of DNA from bite marks to determine species and individual animals that attack humans. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 38(2), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.391

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free