Are downloads and readership data a substitute for citations? The case of a scholarly journal

  • Schlögl C
  • Gorraiz J
  • Gumpenberger C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the advent of e-journals more than one decade ago and the increasing use of social media also by academics in recent years, cita­tions are not the only data anymore for measuring scholarly com­mu­ni­cation. Indeed, so-called altme­trics are a further source for metering science. In our previous research we have already ex­plored commonalities of and differences between citations, downloads and so-called readership data from Mendeley for two information systems journals. This contribution presents a replication of the previous study for a linguistics journal inves­tigating the following research questions: Is there a strong correlation between cita­tions, downloads and readership frequen­cies? Could downloads and readership counts be a substitute for citations, or do they measure complementary aspects of schol­arly communication? Do citations and downloads have differ­ent obsolescence characteristics? Are there other aspects in which citations, down­loads and readership data differ? The comparison of the results for the linguistic journal with those of the information systems jour­nals enables us to identify also possible disci­pli­­nary differ­ences. We used a scientometric approach when ana­lyzing cita­tions, downloads and readership data, which were provided at article level. The major results show that there is a clear but not a very high rank correlation between citations and down­loads (r=0.59) which was lower between down­loads and readership counts (r=0.53) and between citations and readership counts (r=0.51). Citations and downloads have different obsoles­cence char­acteristics. While the download maxi­mum usually occurs for recent articles, it takes several years after publication until the citation max­i­­mum is reached. The correlations were slight­ly higher for the information systems jour­nals. Interestingly, older articles were more often downloaded for them than for Journal of Phonetics.   Keywords : citations, downloads, Mendeley, alt­metrics, linguistics, Journal of Phonetics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schlögl, C., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., Jack, K., & Kraker, P. (2014). Are downloads and readership data a substitute for citations? The case of a scholarly journal. In Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA). Retrieved from http://ozk.unizd.hr/proceedings/index.php/lida/article/view/165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free