Drops in the bucket? A review of onshore responses to Somali piracy

23Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

That piracy needs to be addressed onshore is a widely shared assumption. While the majority of counter-piracy measures focus on the sea, a number of onshore counter-piracy initiatives have been launched. We can observe the seeds of an alternative land-based policy approach. One set of land-based programs aims at strengthening the legal and security state apparatus to better deter and punish pirates. The other set of programs aims at addressing local populations on regional, clan or village levels. Such projects aim at increasing surveillance, sensitizing populations for the consequences of piracy, and providing rehabilitation or alternative livelihood opportunities. In this article, I review the latter type of projects and discuss the promises and difficulties of addressing piracy by such measures. I discuss five major problems: knowledge problems, implementation problems, counterintuitive consequences, tensions towards other parts of counter-piracy strategy, and the securitization of aid. © 2012 World Maritime University.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bueger, C. (2012). Drops in the bucket? A review of onshore responses to Somali piracy. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 11(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-012-0022-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free