Effects of rules and self-rules on schedule performance in two-person experiments

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Verbal descriptions of reinforcement contingencies (rules) often exert control over human behavior. The present study investigated how rules affected behaviors when two participants partially communicated with each other during an experiment. Mouse clicks by undergraduate students produced points depending on a multiple fixed-ratio 50 differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 10-s schedule. During interruptions in the multiple schedules, participants were asked to describe the schedule contingencies, and then a speaker read the rules to one of a pair of participants (a listener). Discrimination ratios for the listeners were significantly higher than those for participants who were not asked to describe the rules or listened to other's rules. When both schedules changed to fixed-interval 10-s, all groups were sensitive to schedule changes. The results suggest that the acquisition of schedule-appropriate behavior was affected by instructions even though the instructions were given by individuals other than the experimenter and were imperfect. The results also suggest that the effects of rules and self-rules can be replicated in two-person experiments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakamura, S., & Okouchi, H. (2018). Effects of rules and self-rules on schedule performance in two-person experiments. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 89(4), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.89.17317

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free