An empirical framework for comparing effectiveness of testing and property-based formal analysis

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Today, many formal analysis tools are not only used to provide certainty but are also used to debug software systems - a role that has traditional been reserved for testing tools. We are interested in exploring the complementary relationship as well as tradeoffs between testing and formal analysis with respect to debugging and more specifically bug detection. In this paper we present an approach to the assessment of testing and formal analysis tools using metrics to measure the quantity and efficiency of each technique at finding bugs. We also present an assessment framework that has been constructed to allow for symmetrical comparison and evaluation of tests versus properties. We are currently beginning to conduct experiments and this paper presents a discussion of possible outcomes of our proposed empirical study. © 2005 ACM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bradbury, J. S., Cordy, J. R., & Dingel, J. (2005). An empirical framework for comparing effectiveness of testing and property-based formal analysis. In ACM SIGPLAN/SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering (pp. 2–5). https://doi.org/10.1145/1108792.1108795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free