Energy tradeoffs in automotive use of steel, fiber-reinforced plastics and aluminum

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The embodied energy, structural weight, and transportation energy (fuel requirement) characteristics of steel, fiber-reinforced plastics, and aluminum were assessed to determine the overall energy savings of materials substitution in automobiles. In body panels, a 1.0-lb steel component with an associated 0.5 lb in secondary weight is structurally equivalent to a 0.6-lb fiber-reinforced plastic component with 0.3 lb in associated secondary weight or a 0.5-lb aluminum component with 0.25 lb of secondary weight. The total energy requirements of structurally equivalent body panels (including their embodied and life cycle transportation energies) are: steel (211.6 × 103 Btu), fiber-reinforced plastics (126.7 × 103 Btu), and aluminum (174.3 × 103 Btu). Fiber-reinforced plastics offer greatest improvements in embodied and total energy requirements, while aluminum achieves greatest savings in transportation energy. Copyright © 1981 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cummings-Saxton, J. (1982). Energy tradeoffs in automotive use of steel, fiber-reinforced plastics and aluminum. In SAE Technical Papers. SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/820151

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free