Epidemiologic differences between chlamydia and gonorrhea

111Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To assess the prevalence, demographics, and transmission patterns of genital chlamydia infection, we screened 3,078 patients, and compared identified cases (N = 511) to gonorrhea cases (N = 291) diagnosed in the same setting. Chlamydia cases were younger and more likely to be White than their gonorrhea counterparts. Chlamydia cases were distributed diffusely; geographic overlap between the two diseases was only about 40 percent. Gonoccocal coinfection was noted in <10 percent of patients with chlamydia. Nearly half of men with chlamydia and four-fifths of women were asymptomatic and most cases were identified through screening or contact tracing. Populations at high risk for chlamydia are seemingly different from those for gonorrhea. Differences may be due to control interventions (active for gonorrhea, passive for chlamydia). Chlamydia case reporting and control initiatives are recommended.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zimmerman, H. L., Potterat, J. J., Dukes, R. L., Muth, J. B., Zimmerman, H. P., Fogle, J. S., & Pratts, C. I. (1990). Epidemiologic differences between chlamydia and gonorrhea. American Journal of Public Health, 80(11), 1338–1342. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.80.11.1338

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free