Equity

1Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Representation, according to Gallard and colleagues (1998), is the central issue of curriculum and equity. Representation is the public expression of our thoughts so that they can be inspected, scrutinised, criticised and shared with others (Eisner, 1993). The forms of representation used and valued by teachers influence how students come to understand and represent their own thoughts. Classroom organisation, selection of content and activities, student groupings, teacher instructions, body language, reward signals and assessment procedures are all examples of forms of representation. The problem is that in selecting equitable forms of representation teachers can only rely on their own realities (experiences and understandings) to decide what is important to attend to and what is not. Other classroom realities – such as those of the students – are largely inaccessible to the teacher. This inevitable mismatch between the teacher’s reality and the various student realities leads to a set of dilemmas for the teacher in selecting equitable forms of representation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krueger, B., Barton, A., & Rennie, L. J. (2005). Equity. In Dilemmas of Science Teaching: Perspectives on Problems of Practice (pp. 73–85). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996294-11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free