"To err is human": An examination of the effectiveness of error management training

57Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research explores how the effectiveness of word-processing training is impacted by a trainee's goal (learning vs. performance) and whether the training program is designed to encourage or discourage errors (error management vs. error avoidant). Ninety-four trainees were randomly assigned to one of four word processing training programs. Results indicated several beneficial effects of both error management training and learning goals including enhanced performance, increased intrinsic motivation, and decreased frustration. Results are discussed in terms of how error management principles might be implemented as well as which worker groups might be most responsive to this type of training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nordstrom, C. R., Wendland, D., & Williams, K. B. (1998). “To err is human”: An examination of the effectiveness of error management training. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025019212263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free