Error disclosure in pathology and laboratory medicine: A review of the literature

5Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the fields of anatomic and clinical pathology have made strong commitments to improving patient safety, including the creation of formal and informal guidelines for assessing and reporting quality lapses. Unfortunately, some medical errors are inevitable. Patient safety experts advocate full and complete disclosure of all serious medical errors in an effort to preserve the patient-physician relationship and minimize the risk of harm to patients. While evidence suggests that most pathologists disclose serious medical errors, many do not disclose such errors to patients. A literature review of articles published on diagnostic error disclosure in pathology and laboratory medicine suggests that there are in fact persistent barriers to the disclosure of diagnostic errors that are specific to pathology. A number of these barriers are considered here, followed by recommendations for improving patient safety in pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perkins, I. U. (2016, August 1). Error disclosure in pathology and laboratory medicine: A review of the literature. AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.nlit1-1608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free