Explaining accommodation and resistance to demands for independence referendums in the UK and Spain

29Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines why the UK Government accepted the 2014 Scottish independence referendum while the Spanish Government opposes a similar referendum in Catalonia. Adopting a most similar research design, we argue that the variation is best explained by perceived political opportunities by the two ruling parties. These are embedded in different conceptions of the state and constitutional designs, mostly mononational in Spain and mostly plurinational in the UK but multiple and contested in both cases. In Spain, vote-seeking calculations incentivise the Popular Party to oppose a referendum, while its mononational conception of the state and the Spanish constitutional design provide a further constraint and a discursive justification for their position. In the UK, David Cameron's accommodating position was based on the view that the Scottish referendum was low risk – as support for independence was minimal – with a high reward: the annihilation of the independence demand. The Conservatives have recently adopted a more restrictive position because seeming political advantage has changed. The findings suggest that independence referendums will continue to be rare events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cetrà, D., & Harvey, M. (2019). Explaining accommodation and resistance to demands for independence referendums in the UK and Spain. Nations and Nationalism, 25(2), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12417

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free