Why faculty did-and did not-integrate instructional software in their undergraduate classrooms

10Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using a comparative case study approach, the researcher followed 13 instructors for 2 years as they attempted to integrate the Visible Human Dissector, an educational software program, into their undergraduate anatomy courses. Instructors were motivated to use the software as a supplement for limited educational resources and because of its ability to provide students with novel educational experiences. Obstacles in technology access and services as well as organizational factors prevented integration. However, personal hesitancy and lack of confidence, posited to be a major obstacle to integration in the literature, played only a minimal role in slow integration for these instructors. The greatest obstacles to changes in instruction supported by the new technology were difficulties in finding computers to run the software in traditional anatomy laboratories. © 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weston, T. J. (2005, June). Why faculty did-and did not-integrate instructional software in their undergraduate classrooms. Innovative Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-5013-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free