Farmers' work-day noise exposure

17Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to understand the extent of farmers' exposure to hazardous noise, and trial and test the ability of an on-farm noise audit report to improve awareness and preventative action towards farm based noise hazards. Design: Visits were made to working farms where noise and dosimetry measurements undertaken. During return visits, the noise measurements were explained in a brief report. A follow-up questionnaire was implemented gathering feedback on the use or otherwise of the report. Setting: Working farms in Western Victoria and SE Queensland including dairy, beef, wool, prime lamb and cropping. Participants: Participants were 14 female and 37 male farm workers. Interventions: Noise exposure assessment of daily activities through dosimetry; measurements of noisy tasks and machinery; supply and interpretation of a noise audit report. Main outcome measures: Participants were supplied with a 'noise report' of their workplace together with an explanation of the report's meaning to farm workers. Results: Men and women have similar at risk exposures. The average noise exposure was 1.09Pa2h (LAeq,8h=85.3dB). This implies 163000 Australian agricultural workers are at risk from hazardous noise. On-farm noise audit reports were a relevant and valuable feedback to farmers in relation to their potential noise hazards. Conclusions: Of those measured 51%, and by extrapolation 163000 Australian agricultural workers, have noise exposure levels greater than the recommended Australian Standard of 1.01Pa2h (85dB). Men and women are equally exposed. On-farm noise audit reports are an effective feedback to increase awareness and improve hearing health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, W., Brumby, S., Calvano, A., Hatherell, T., Mason, H., Mercer-Grant, C., & Hogan, A. (2015). Farmers’ work-day noise exposure. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 23(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12153

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free