Financial statement fraud

  • Chapman R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
259Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. American Accounting Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Accounting Review This content downloaded from 134.76.184.106 on Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:09:24 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms ABSTRACT: This study empirically tests the prediction that the inclusion of larger proportions of outside members on the board of directors significantly reduces the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Results from logit regression analysis of 75 fraud and 75 no-fraud firms indicate that no-fraud firms have boards with significantly higher percentages of outside members than fraud firms; however, the presence of an audit committee does not significantly affect the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Additionally, as outside director ownership in the firm and outside director tenure on the board increase, and as the number of outside directorships in other firms held by outside directors decreases, the likelihood of financial statement fraud decreases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, R. J. (2022). Financial statement fraud. In The SME Business Guide to Fraud Risk Management (pp. 233–250). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200383-17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free