Fruitful interchange or polite chitchat? The dialogue between science and theology

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The demand that epistemic support be explicated as rational compulsion has consistently undermined the dialogue between theology and science. Rational compulsion entails too restrictive a form of epistemic support for most scientific theorizing, let alone interdisciplinary dialogue. This essay presents a less restrictive form of epistemic support, explicated not as rational compulsion but as explanatory power. Once this notion of epistemic support is developed, a genuinely productive interdisciplinary dialogue between theology and science becomes possible. This essay closes by sketching how the Big Bang model from cosmology and the Christian doctrine of Creation can be viewed as supporting each other. © 1998 by the Joint Publication Board of Zygon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dembski, W. A., & Meyer, S. C. (1998). Fruitful interchange or polite chitchat? The dialogue between science and theology. Zygon, 33(3), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00158

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free