Who gains from apparentments under D'Hondt?

19Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Apparentments - or coalitions of several electoral lists - are a widely neglected aspect of the study of proportional electoral systems. This paper proposes a formal model that explains the benefits political parties derive from apparentments, based on their alliance strategies and relative size. In doing so, it reveals that apparentments are most beneficial for highly fractionalised political blocs. However, it also emerges that large parties stand to gain much more from apparentments than small parties do. Because of this, small parties are likely to join in apparentments with other small parties, excluding large parties where possible. These arguments are tested empirically, using a new dataset from the Swiss national parliamentary elections covering a period from 1995 to 2007. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bochsler, D. (2010). Who gains from apparentments under D’Hondt? Electoral Studies, 29(4), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free